XAPR vs. HELO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XAPR returned 8.79% vs 11.08% for HELO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.

Performance

XAPR vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 2.31% return.

XAPR

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 4.05%
• 1Y: 8.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HELO

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: 11.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAPR vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	3.39%	12.57%	8.25%
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.31%	7.82%	14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and HELO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	0.81

The correlation between XAPR and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XAPR vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAPR

XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

HELO

HELO Risk / Return Rank: 50
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAPR vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAPR	HELO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.31	1.79	+2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.30	2.53	+4.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.06	1.36	+0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.37	1.93	+11.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	70.60	8.55	+62.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAPR vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is higher than the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAPR	HELO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31	1.79	+2.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	1.64	+0.24

Drawdowns

XAPR vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and HELO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAPR	HELO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-10.89%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.66%	-5.76%	+5.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.28%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-1.18%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.12%	1.30%	-1.18%

Volatility

XAPR vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) at 0.70%. This indicates that XAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAPR	HELO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	0.70%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.31%	4.99%	-3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05%	6.21%	-4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.18%	7.96%	-1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.18%	7.96%	-1.78%

XAPR vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAPR vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.62%	0.67%	0.60%	0.19%
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAPR and HELO in my portfolio?

XAPR and HELO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAPR or HELO?

XAPR has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to HELO (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAPR dropped -6.18% vs HELO's -10.89%.

Which ETF is better, XAPR or HELO?

On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 11.08% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAPR or HELO?

Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAPR or HELO?

HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAPR or HELO?

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

What is the main difference between XAPR and HELO?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XAPR and 0.50% for HELO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.