PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAPR vs. FDND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAPR vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's 2.42% return.


XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDND

1D
-1.99%
1M
3.57%
YTD
2.42%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAPR vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and FDND is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.63

The correlation between XAPR and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAPR vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAPR vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAPRFDNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

1.08

+0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.37

0.36

+13.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

70.60

0.88

+69.72

XAPR vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAPRFDNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31

0.40

+3.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

0.60

+1.28

Drawdowns

XAPR vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and FDND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAPRFDNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-24.12%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.66%

-20.49%

+19.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-4.24%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-5.67%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

8.39%

-8.27%

Volatility

XAPR vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) is 0.75%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that XAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAPRFDNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

5.29%

-4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

14.07%

-12.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05%

18.28%

-16.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.18%

21.40%

-15.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.18%

21.40%

-15.22%

XAPR vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAPR vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XAPR and FDND have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to XAPR (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAPR dropped -6.18% vs FDND's -24.12%.

On 1-year performance, XAPR leads with 8.79% vs 7.37% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XAPR has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

XAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XAPR and 0.75% for FDND.

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAPR and FDND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer