PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAPR vs. APRJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAPR vs. APRJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than APRJ's 3.18% return.


XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRJ

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.64%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAPR vs. APRJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and APRJ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.56

The correlation between XAPR and APRJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAPR vs. APRJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

APRJ
APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAPR vs. APRJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAPRAPRJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.31

4.63

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.30

9.47

-2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

2.20

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

13.37

34.55

-21.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

70.60

103.47

-32.87

XAPR vs. APRJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is comparable to the APRJ Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and APRJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAPRAPRJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31

4.63

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

1.80

+0.08

Drawdowns

XAPR vs. APRJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, which is greater than APRJ's maximum drawdown of -4.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and APRJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAPRAPRJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-4.68%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.66%

-0.20%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.12%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-0.12%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

0.07%

+0.05%

Volatility

XAPR vs. APRJ - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) at 0.47%. This indicates that XAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAPRAPRJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.47%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

1.14%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05%

1.50%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.18%

3.63%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.18%

3.63%

+2.55%

XAPR vs. APRJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRJ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAPR vs. APRJ - Dividend Comparison

XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XAPR and APRJ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAPR has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to APRJ (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAPR dropped -6.18% vs APRJ's -4.68%.

On 1-year performance, XAPR leads with 8.79% vs 6.91% for APRJ. On fees, APRJ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XAPR has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRJ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XAPR and 0.79% for APRJ.

APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 4.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAPR and APRJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer