XAIX vs. PSI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAIX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XAIX returned 52.90% vs 200.81% for PSI. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAIX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.

Performance

XAIX vs. PSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIX achieves a 30.66% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 116.16% return.

XAIX

• 1D: -4.93%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 30.66%
• 6M: 30.48%
• 1Y: 52.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSI

• 1D: -7.60%
• 1M: 10.87%
• YTD: 116.16%
• 6M: 110.97%
• 1Y: 200.81%
• 3Y*: 58.76%
• 5Y*: 32.86%
• 10Y*: 35.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAIX vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	30.66%	29.05%	15.21%
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	116.16%	36.32%	9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XAIX and PSI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	0.75

The correlation between XAIX and PSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAIX vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XAIX	PSI
Technology	71.7%	98.4%
Communication Services	14.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	-
Financial Services	5.2%	-
Industrials	0.1%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

XAIX vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PSI

PSI Risk / Return Rank: 96
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAIX vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAIX	PSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	4.79	-2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	4.40	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.61	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	13.06	-9.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	45.36	-32.62

XAIX vs. PSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the PSI Sharpe Ratio of 4.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIX and PSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAIX vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIX drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX and PSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAIX	PSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-62.96%	+39.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-15.48%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-41.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-7.60%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-15.90%	+12.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	4.45%	-0.29%

Volatility

XAIX vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) is 14.31%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 21.88%. This indicates that XAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAIX	PSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.31%	21.88%	-7.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.18%	35.15%	-13.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.04%	42.19%	-18.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.71%	38.84%	-14.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.71%	35.61%	-10.90%

XAIX vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAIX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAIX vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison

XAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than PSI's 0.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	0.03%	0.10%	0.15%	0.40%	0.61%	0.14%	0.21%	0.52%	0.83%	0.21%	0.68%	0.16%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.39%	0.54%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAIX and PSI in my portfolio?

XAIX and PSI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAIX or PSI?

PSI has higher volatility (21.88%) compared to XAIX (14.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAIX dropped -23.95% vs PSI's -62.96%.

Which ETF is better, XAIX or PSI?

On 1-year performance, PSI leads with 200.81% vs 52.90% for XAIX. On fees, XAIX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAIX has been the lower-risk option at 14.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAIX or PSI?

Over the 1-year period, PSI has performed better with a 200.81% return vs 52.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAIX or PSI?

XAIX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAIX or PSI?

XAIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.03% for PSI.

What is the main difference between XAIX and PSI?

XAIX is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAIX and 0.56% for PSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.79 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.