XAIX vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XAIX tracks the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XAIX returned 65.74% vs 12.86% for KROP. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAIX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

XAIX vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIX achieves a 37.50% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.59% return.

XAIX

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 17.77%
• YTD: 37.50%
• 6M: 38.65%
• 1Y: 65.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 0.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAIX vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	37.50%	29.05%	15.47%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.59%	7.95%	-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XAIX and KROP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2024	0.28

The correlation between XAIX and KROP shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XAIX vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XAIX	KROP
Technology	71.7%	-
Communication Services	14.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	0.3%
Financial Services	5.2%	-
Industrials	0.1%	39.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	26.3%
Healthcare	0.0%	0.3%
Basic Materials	0.0%	32.1%
Energy	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

XAIX vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 87
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 23
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAIX vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAIX	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	0.81	+2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	1.24	+2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.15	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.72	1.14	+3.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.41	2.58	+14.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAIX vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIX and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAIX	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	0.81	+2.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.06	-0.57	+2.63

Drawdowns

XAIX vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIX drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAIX	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-61.96%	+38.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-11.29%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.19%	-48.93%	+45.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-44.50%	+41.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	4.99%	-1.20%

Volatility

XAIX vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that XAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAIX	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.43%	4.69%	+4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.51%	11.98%	+5.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.93%	16.04%	+4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.39%	22.27%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.39%	22.27%	+1.12%

XAIX vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAIX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAIX vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

XAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than KROP's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.34%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.39%	0.54%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAIX and KROP in my portfolio?

XAIX and KROP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAIX or KROP?

XAIX has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAIX dropped -23.95% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, XAIX or KROP?

On 1-year performance, XAIX leads with 65.74% vs 12.86% for KROP. On fees, XAIX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAIX or KROP?

Over the 1-year period, XAIX has performed better with a 65.74% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAIX or KROP?

XAIX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAIX or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.39% for XAIX.

What is the main difference between XAIX and KROP?

XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAIX and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.