XAIX vs. CRTC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAIX is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while CRTC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XAIX returned 41.00% vs 14.54% for CRTC. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

XAIX vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIX achieves a 23.93% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 6.95% return.

XAIX

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -2.20%
• 6M: 21.95%
• YTD: 23.93%
• 1Y: 41.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.89%

CRTC

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• 6M: 4.69%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 1Y: 14.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	$258.18K	$628.52K	$497.75K
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	$920.82K	$1.57M	$1.97M

XAIX vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	23.93%	29.05%	15.21%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	6.95%	18.69%	4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XAIX and CRTC is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	0.88

The correlation between XAIX and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAIX vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XAIX	CRTC
Technology	79.0%	39.6%
Communication Services	10.4%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	4.9%
Financial Services	4.4%	0.1%
Industrials	0.1%	13.4%
Healthcare	0.0%	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	0.0%	3.0%
Energy	0.0%	5.8%
Utilities	0.0%	5.5%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

XAIX vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 60
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 37
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XAIX vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAIX	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	0.92	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	1.31	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.16	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	1.42	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	4.45	+2.25

XAIX vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIX and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAIX vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIX drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAIX	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-19.07%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.95%	-9.05%	-7.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.74%	-2.76%	-9.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-2.23%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.59%	2.88%	+2.71%

Volatility

XAIX vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) has a higher volatility of 9.18% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.66%. This indicates that XAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAIX	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.18%	3.66%	+5.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.99%	10.80%	+12.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.88%	13.91%	+11.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	15.77%	+9.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.09%	15.77%	+9.32%

XAIX vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XAIX and CRTC have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

XAIX vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

XAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than CRTC's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.89%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.42%	0.54%	0.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAIX and CRTC in my portfolio?

XAIX and CRTC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAIX or CRTC?

XAIX has higher volatility (9.18%) compared to CRTC (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAIX dropped -23.95% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, XAIX or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, XAIX leads with 41.00% vs 14.54% for CRTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAIX or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, XAIX has performed better with a 41.00% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAIX or CRTC?

XAIX and CRTC have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAIX or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.42% for XAIX.

What is the main difference between XAIX and CRTC?

XAIX is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while CRTC is Technology Equities. XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.