PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAIX vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XAIX vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XAIX vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XAIX
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF
-7.03%29.05%15.47%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
4.90%49.85%22.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIX achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 4.90% return.


XAIX

1D
3.74%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-3.63%
1Y
27.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHAT

1D
4.72%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
4.90%
6M
3.42%
1Y
82.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XAIX vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAIX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XAIX vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAIX
XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAIX vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAIXCHATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

2.42

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

3.04

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.94

-2.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

13.74

-6.94

XAIX vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIX and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAIXCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.42

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.27

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between XAIX and CHAT is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XAIX vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

XAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than CHAT's 2.72% yield.


Drawdowns

XAIX vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIX drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX and CHAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XAIXCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

-31.34%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-16.28%

+2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.80%

-6.73%

-4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-5.61%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

5.85%

-1.83%

Volatility

XAIX vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) is 8.72%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 13.21%. This indicates that XAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XAIXCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.72%

13.21%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

23.24%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.04%

34.27%

-10.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.64%

29.27%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.64%

29.27%

-6.63%