PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIX.DE achieves a 37.21% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return.


XAIX.DE

1D
-2.02%
1M
18.07%
YTD
37.21%
6M
38.87%
1Y
62.15%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
22.22%
10Y*

XDWH.DE

1D
2.85%
1M
3.94%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
-1.54%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XAIX.DE
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF
37.21%15.25%34.63%63.77%-31.80%35.85%24.44%15.10%
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-1.98%2.21%7.44%0.04%-0.07%30.55%2.69%18.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XAIX.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between XAIX.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAIX.DE
XAIX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XAIX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.DE
XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAIX.DEXDWH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.13

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

0.93

+4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

2.28

+12.44

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIX.DE and XDWH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAIX.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

0.70

+2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.41

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.55

+0.53

Drawdowns

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIX.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.08%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX.DE and XDWH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAIX.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.08%

-26.08%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-10.32%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.61%

-21.12%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.08%

-21.12%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-8.51%

+5.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.39%

-4.82%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

4.20%

+0.01%

Volatility

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that XAIX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAIX.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

4.81%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.15%

9.51%

+6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.43%

13.69%

+6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

13.43%

+7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

14.69%

+6.61%

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAIX.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAIX.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAIX.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XAIX.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAIX.DE.

XAIX.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XAIX.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAIX.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAIX.DE and XDWH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer