PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAIN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIN.DE achieves a -35.20% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's 4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XAIN.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of -4.31%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.50% annualized return.


XAIN.DE

1D
0.80%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-35.20%
6M
-34.92%
1Y
-35.36%
3Y*
-20.87%
5Y*
-7.11%
10Y*
-4.31%

XDWH.DE

1D
1.49%
1M
8.18%
YTD
4.87%
6M
5.19%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAIN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-35.20%-13.48%-8.83%1.94%9.89%9.49%-17.12%11.55%-6.61%8.84%
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
4.87%2.20%7.45%0.04%0.11%30.30%2.70%27.21%5.98%5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XAIN.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between XAIN.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAIN.DE
XAIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
XAIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
XAIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.DE
XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAIN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XAIN.DEXDWH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.25

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

2.01

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.91

5.15

-7.07

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIN.DE and XDWH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIN.DE and XDWH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAIN.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-40.65%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.99%

-9.82%

-37.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.20%

-21.11%

-38.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.68%

-21.11%

-39.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.68%

-26.06%

-34.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.58%

-2.12%

-52.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-7.35%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.88%

3.84%

+14.04%

Volatility

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.13% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 5.33%. This indicates that XAIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAIN.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.13%

5.33%

+8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.46%

10.01%

+13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.29%

14.10%

+13.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

13.48%

+7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

15.63%

+8.78%

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAIN.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAIN.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAIN.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XAIN.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XAIN.DE.

XAIN.DE is categorized as Indonesia Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XAIN.DE tracks MSCI Indonesia, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XAIN.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAIN.DE and XDWH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer