XAGG vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) and PYLD (PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAGG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.

Performance

XAGG vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.95% return.

XAGG

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PYLD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 7.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGG vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	1.93%	1.61%
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	0.95%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGG and PYLD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

XAGG vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 66
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGG vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAGG	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	2.04	-0.16

Drawdowns

XAGG vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum PYLD drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAGG	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-4.52%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.44%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.57%	-0.65%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XAGG	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	3.08%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.48%	3.99%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.48%	3.99%	-0.51%

XAGG vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAGG vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than PYLD's 6.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.30%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	3.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAGG and PYLD in my portfolio?

XAGG and PYLD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XAGG or PYLD?

On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAGG or PYLD?

XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAGG or PYLD?

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 3.86% for XAGG.

What is the main difference between XAGG and PYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.55% for PYLD.