XAGG vs. IEO
XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) and IEO (iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGG is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while IEO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index. XAGG is actively managed, while IEO is passively managed. Their -0.28 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XAGG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IEO.
Performance
XAGG vs. IEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than IEO's 42.54% return.
XAGG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IEO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 29.47%
- YTD
- 42.54%
- 1Y
- 47.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 23.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.85M | $6.98M | $8.74M | |
| $9.69M | $13.10M | $11.08M |
XAGG vs. IEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 2.19% | 1.75% |
IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 42.54% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAGG and IEO is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAGG vs. IEO — Risk / Return Rank
XAGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IEO
XAGG vs. IEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAGG | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAGG vs. IEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum IEO drawdown of -79.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and IEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAGG | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -79.17% | +76.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.83% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -26.14% | +25.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.54% | — |
Volatility
XAGG vs. IEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAGG | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 25.90% | -22.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.42% | 30.27% | -26.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.42% | 34.91% | -31.49% |
XAGG vs. IEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IEO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAGG vs. IEO - Dividend Comparison
XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than IEO's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.85% | 2.61% | 2.63% | 3.00% | 3.77% | 2.62% | 3.17% | 1.85% | 1.67% | 0.94% | 0.98% | 2.03% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 5.07% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAGG and IEO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAGG.
XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 1.85% for IEO.
XAGG is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while IEO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.38% for IEO.
Find the right allocation for XAGG and IEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer