XAGG vs. EVLN
XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) and EVLN (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGG is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while EVLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAGG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EVLN.
Performance
XAGG vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly higher than EVLN's 1.45% return.
XAGG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVLN
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAGG vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 2.05% | 1.61% |
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 1.45% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAGG and EVLN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAGG vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank
XAGG
EVLN
XAGG vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAGG | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.94 | 2.56 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
XAGG vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, roughly equal to the maximum EVLN drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and EVLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAGG | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -2.78% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | 0.00% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -0.22% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility
XAGG vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAGG | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 1.87% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 2.43% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 2.43% | +1.04% |
XAGG vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAGG vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison
XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than EVLN's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 6.91% | 7.28% | 6.41% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 3.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAGG and EVLN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.
EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 3.86% for XAGG.
XAGG is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while EVLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.60% for EVLN.
Find the right allocation for XAGG and EVLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer