XAGG vs. EINC
XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGG is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. XAGG is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. XAGG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
XAGG vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.27% return.
XAGG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 29.77%
- 5Y*
- 20.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
XAGG vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 2.22% | 1.75% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.27% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAGG and EINC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAGG vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
XAGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC
XAGG vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAGG | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAGG vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAGG | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -87.55% | +84.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -5.79% | +5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -44.16% | +43.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility
XAGG vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAGG | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51% | 15.07% | -11.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 19.54% | -16.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 25.43% | -21.92% |
XAGG vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAGG vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than EINC's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.56% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 3.85% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAGG and EINC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAGG.
XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.56% for EINC.
XAGG is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for XAGG and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer