XAGG vs. DBE
XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGG is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. XAGG is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. XAGG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
XAGG vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.04% return.
XAGG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- 79.04%
- 6M
- 69.31%
- 1Y
- 81.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
XAGG vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 2.05% | 1.61% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 79.04% | -6.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAGG and DBE is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAGG vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
XAGG
DBE
XAGG vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAGG | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.94 | 0.09 | +1.85 |
Drawdowns
XAGG vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAGG | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -86.69% | +83.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -32.03% | +31.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -57.30% | +56.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.37% | — |
Volatility
XAGG vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAGG | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 35.07% | -31.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 29.41% | -25.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 28.34% | -24.87% |
XAGG vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAGG vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than DBE's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.16% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 3.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAGG and DBE have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.16% for DBE.
XAGG is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.78% for DBE.
Find the right allocation for XAGG and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer