X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Financials Equities funds - X7PP.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while UIFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 14.91%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for UIFS.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UIFS.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has outperformed UIFS.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while UIFS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.04% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -25.45% | 15.44% |
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.82% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | 38.07% | -6.59% | 27.05% | -9.40% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and UIFS.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.60 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and UIFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
UIFS.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
UIFS.L
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Energy
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Technology
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
UIFS.L
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.07 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 0.36 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 0.83 | +8.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.33 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.52 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.65 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.62 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than UIFS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and UIFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -35.31% | -20.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -12.90% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -18.72% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -18.72% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -35.31% | -20.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -6.76% | +5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -6.08% | -9.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 5.53% | -0.76% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) at 4.41%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 4.41% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 10.58% | +7.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 13.98% | +7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 17.54% | +5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 20.12% | +4.51% |
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and UIFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer