X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 14.91%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for SSAC.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than SSAC.L's 11.86% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has outperformed SSAC.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while SSAC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.47% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
SSAC.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 30.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -25.45% | 15.44% |
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.86% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 22.09% | -4.79% | 13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and SSAC.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.57 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and SSAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
SSAC.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
SSAC.L
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Energy
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Technology
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
SSAC.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
SSAC.L
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.54 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 4.26 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 17.20 | -8.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.85 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.94 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.89 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than SSAC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and SSAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -25.43% | -30.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -7.01% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -17.99% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -17.99% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -25.43% | -30.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -0.40% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -3.50% | -11.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 1.74% | +3.03% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) at 2.90%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 2.90% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 7.73% | +10.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 10.48% | +11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 12.98% | +10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 14.38% | +10.25% |
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both X7PP.L and SSAC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor SSAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and SSAC.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
X7PP.L and SSAC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while SSAC.L is Global Equities. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and SSAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer