X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 14.91%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -25.45% | 15.44% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and SPXP.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.39 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
SPXP.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Technology
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
SPXP.L
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.52 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 4.11 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 15.13 | -6.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.78 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 1.10 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.15 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -25.46% | -30.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -7.09% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -20.77% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -20.77% | -10.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -25.46% | -30.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -0.21% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -3.50% | -11.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 1.93% | +2.84% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 2.65% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 7.24% | +10.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 10.49% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 14.23% | +9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 16.22% | +8.41% |
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer