PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 7-10 UCITS ETF (X710.DE) and Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X710.DE achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than KX1G.DE's 0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, X710.DE has underperformed KX1G.DE with an annualized return of -0.16%, while KX1G.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.22% annualized return.


X710.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.09%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
0.27%
3Y*
2.66%
5Y*
-2.29%
10Y*
-0.16%

KX1G.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.10%
1Y
0.45%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
-1.81%
10Y*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X710.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 7-10 UCITS ETF
0.09%1.72%0.93%8.80%-19.69%-3.23%4.20%6.78%1.03%0.95%
KX1G.DE
Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR
0.22%1.21%2.65%7.57%-18.42%-3.38%5.42%8.82%0.15%0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between X710.DE and KX1G.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.79

The correlation between X710.DE and KX1G.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X710.DE
X710.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
X710.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X710.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
X710.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
X710.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
X710.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

KX1G.DE
KX1G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KX1G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 7-10 UCITS ETF (X710.DE) and Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


X710.DEKX1G.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.02

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.13

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.18

0.34

-0.16

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X710.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the KX1G.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X710.DE and KX1G.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


X710.DEKX1G.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.10

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

-0.27

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.04

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.41

+0.14

Drawdowns

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X710.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, roughly equal to the maximum KX1G.DE drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X710.DE and KX1G.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X710.DEKX1G.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.16%

-22.43%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-3.54%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.55%

-4.22%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.84%

-21.59%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.16%

-22.43%

-0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.46%

-12.10%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-6.69%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.34%

+0.21%

Volatility

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 7-10 UCITS ETF (X710.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE) at 1.76%. This indicates that X710.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KX1G.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X710.DEKX1G.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

1.76%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

3.80%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.91%

4.57%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

6.66%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

5.94%

+0.45%

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

X710.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than KX1G.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

X710.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither X710.DE nor KX1G.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, X710.DE and KX1G.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, KX1G.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KX1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for X710.DE.

X710.DE tracks Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 7-10, while KX1G.DE tracks FTSE Lowest-Rated Eurozone Government Bond Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for X710.DE and 0.14% for KX1G.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X710.DE and KX1G.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer