PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 7-10 UCITS ETF (X710.DE) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X710.DE achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than IUS5.DE's 2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, X710.DE has underperformed IUS5.DE with an annualized return of -0.16%, while IUS5.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.80% annualized return.


X710.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.11%
1Y
0.75%
3Y*
2.66%
5Y*
-2.29%
10Y*
-0.16%

IUS5.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.48%
YTD
2.13%
6M
1.40%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
0.57%
5Y*
-1.37%
10Y*
0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X710.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 7-10 UCITS ETF
0.09%1.72%0.93%8.80%-19.69%-3.23%4.20%6.78%1.03%0.95%
IUS5.DE
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.13%-3.37%2.59%1.53%-17.29%12.12%2.24%10.07%0.53%-4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between X710.DE and IUS5.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2009

0.42

The correlation between X710.DE and IUS5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X710.DE
X710.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
X710.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X710.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
X710.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
X710.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
X710.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IUS5.DE
IUS5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IUS5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 7-10 UCITS ETF (X710.DE) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


X710.DEIUS5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.07

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.87

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.18

1.67

-1.49

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X710.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the IUS5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X710.DE and IUS5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


X710.DEIUS5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.40

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

-0.16

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.10

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.42

+0.12

Drawdowns

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X710.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, roughly equal to the maximum IUS5.DE drawdown of -22.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X710.DE and IUS5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X710.DEIUS5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.16%

-22.31%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-2.31%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.55%

-8.42%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.84%

-22.31%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.16%

-22.31%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.46%

-17.45%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-7.45%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.21%

+0.34%

Volatility

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 7-10 UCITS ETF (X710.DE) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE) have volatilities of 1.94% and 1.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X710.DEIUS5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

1.90%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

3.77%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.91%

5.02%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

8.56%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

7.94%

-1.55%

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

X710.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS5.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

X710.DE vs. IUS5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither X710.DE nor IUS5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


X710.DE and IUS5.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X710.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X710.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUS5.DE.

X710.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while IUS5.DE is Inflation-Protected Bonds. X710.DE tracks Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 7-10, while IUS5.DE tracks Bloomberg World Government Inflation-Linked Bond. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for X710.DE and 0.20% for IUS5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X710.DE and IUS5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer