PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (X1GD.DE) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X1GD.DE achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than XGEZ.DE's -0.48% return.


X1GD.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.11%
1Y
1.00%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*

XGEZ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-1.12%
YTD
-0.48%
1Y
-0.39%
3Y*
1.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
X1GD.DE
Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist
-0.11%1.19%2.68%7.59%-0.24%
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
-0.48%-2.16%-0.51%8.88%-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between X1GD.DE and XGEZ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2022

0.98

The correlation between X1GD.DE and XGEZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X1GD.DE
X1GD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
X1GD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X1GD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
X1GD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
X1GD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
X1GD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XGEZ.DE
XGEZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (X1GD.DE) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


X1GD.DEXGEZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.00

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

-0.08

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

-0.18

+0.88

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X1GD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X1GD.DE and XGEZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X1GD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.09%, which is greater than XGEZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X1GD.DE and XGEZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X1GD.DEXGEZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.09%

-13.63%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-4.70%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.19%

-7.82%

+3.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.86%

-5.96%

-4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-5.38%

-7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

2.16%

-0.73%

Volatility

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (X1GD.DE) is 1.23%, while Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that X1GD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGEZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X1GD.DEXGEZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.69%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.99%

5.25%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65%

6.45%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

9.87%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.62%

9.87%

-3.25%

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

X1GD.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XGEZ.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

X1GD.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

X1GD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than XGEZ.DE's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
X1GD.DE
Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.58%2.58%2.32%2.20%2.38%1.48%
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
2.11%1.99%2.07%1.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, X1GD.DE and XGEZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, X1GD.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X1GD.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XGEZ.DE.

X1GD.DE tracks FTSE Lowest-Rated Eurozone Government Bond Investment Grade, while XGEZ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone Sovereigns Green Bonds Capped. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for X1GD.DE and 0.18% for XGEZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X1GD.DE and XGEZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer