PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (X1GD.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X1GD.DE achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 18.84% return.


X1GD.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.11%
1Y
1.00%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*

6AQQ.DE

1D
-0.66%
1M
-2.06%
6M
18.46%
YTD
18.84%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
23.24%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
20.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
X1GD.DE
Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist
-0.11%1.19%2.68%7.59%-18.37%-1.99%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
18.84%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between X1GD.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021

0.10

The correlation between X1GD.DE and 6AQQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X1GD.DE
X1GD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
X1GD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X1GD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
X1GD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
X1GD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
X1GD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (X1GD.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


X1GD.DE6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.31

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

3.03

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

8.69

-7.99

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X1GD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X1GD.DE and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X1GD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.09%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X1GD.DE and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X1GD.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.09%

-31.19%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-10.01%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.19%

-26.73%

+22.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.86%

-2.74%

-8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-5.34%

-7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

3.49%

-2.06%

Volatility

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (X1GD.DE) is 1.23%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that X1GD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X1GD.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

5.72%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.99%

12.42%

-8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65%

17.01%

-12.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

20.01%

-13.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.62%

19.72%

-13.10%

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

X1GD.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

X1GD.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

X1GD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while 6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
X1GD.DE
Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.58%2.58%2.32%2.20%2.38%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


X1GD.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X1GD.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X1GD.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

X1GD.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. X1GD.DE tracks FTSE Lowest-Rated Eurozone Government Bond Investment Grade, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for X1GD.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X1GD.DE and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer