X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE
X03G.DE (Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - X03G.DE is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® EUR Germany, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X03G.DE returned -1.28%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. X03G.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X03G.DE achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, X03G.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of -1.28%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.
X03G.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- 0.86%
- 5Y*
- -3.03%
- 10Y*
- -1.28%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X03G.DE Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF | -0.04% | -1.48% | 0.14% | 5.23% | -17.79% | -2.57% | 2.71% | 2.86% | 2.17% | -1.47% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between X03G.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, X03G.DE and XDWH.DE have become more correlated (0.23) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
X03G.DE
XDWH.DE
X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (X03G.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X03G.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.13 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.93 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 2.28 | -3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X03G.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 0.70 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | 0.41 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.25 | 0.51 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.55 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X03G.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.87%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X03G.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X03G.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.87% | -26.08% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -10.32% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.00% | -21.12% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.19% | -21.12% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.87% | -26.08% | +2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.28% | -8.51% | -10.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -4.82% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 4.20% | -2.82% |
Volatility
X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (X03G.DE) is 1.43%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that X03G.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X03G.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 4.81% | -3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 9.51% | -6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 13.69% | -10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 13.43% | -7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 14.69% | -9.54% |
X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
X03G.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X03G.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither X03G.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X03G.DE Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
X03G.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, X03G.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
X03G.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
X03G.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. X03G.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Germany, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for X03G.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for X03G.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer