PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (X03B.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X03B.DE achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, X03B.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 0.23%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.


X03B.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.20%
1Y
0.95%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
0.23%

XDWH.DE

1D
2.85%
1M
3.42%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X03B.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.05%2.25%3.05%3.35%-4.64%-0.79%-0.13%0.14%-0.34%-0.48%
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-1.98%2.21%7.44%0.04%-0.07%30.55%2.69%27.24%5.96%5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between X03B.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X03B.DE
X03B.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
X03B.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X03B.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
X03B.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
X03B.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
X03B.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.DE
XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (X03B.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


X03B.DEXDWH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.93

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.04

2.28

-0.24

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X03B.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X03B.DE and XDWH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


X03B.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.70

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.41

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.51

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.55

+0.02

Drawdowns

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X03B.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.78%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X03B.DE and XDWH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X03B.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-26.08%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-10.32%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.28%

-21.12%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.67%

-21.12%

+15.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.78%

-26.08%

+19.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-8.51%

+8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-4.82%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

4.20%

-3.80%

Volatility

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (X03B.DE) is 0.50%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that X03B.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X03B.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

4.81%

-4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.20%

9.51%

-8.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30%

13.69%

-12.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.63%

13.43%

-11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.32%

14.69%

-13.37%

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

X03B.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

X03B.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

X03B.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while XDWH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
X03B.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
1.53%1.39%0.98%0.28%0.12%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.66%
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


X03B.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X03B.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X03B.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

X03B.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. X03B.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 1-3, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for X03B.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X03B.DE and XDWH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer