WY vs. WFG
WY (Weyerhaeuser Company) and WFG (West Fraser Timber Co Ltd) are both stocks. WY operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate), while WFG operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, WY returned 1.27%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for WFG. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WY vs. WFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WY having a 7.49% return and WFG slightly lower at 7.15%. Over the past 10 years, WY has underperformed WFG with an annualized return of 1.27%, while WFG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.99% annualized return.
WY
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- 6M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- -6.89%
- 5Y*
- -1.77%
- 10Y*
- 1.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.49%
WFG
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- 6M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- -5.25%
- 3Y*
- -6.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.13M | $14.64M | $13.39M | |
| $125.36M | $121.77M | $132.05M |
WY vs. WFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WY Weyerhaeuser Company | 7.49% | -13.05% | -16.61% | 18.04% | -20.44% | 26.92% | 13.04% | 45.57% | -35.46% | 21.60% |
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | 7.15% | -28.08% | 2.80% | 20.26% | -22.82% | 49.57% | 47.93% | -8.82% | -19.45% | 73.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between WY and WFG is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, WY and WFG have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
WY:
$18.05B
WFG:
$4.93B
WY:
$0.87
WFG:
-$14.77
WY:
1.96
WFG:
1.05
WY:
$6.90B
WFG:
$4.83B
WY:
$914.00M
WFG:
$49.38M
WY:
$1.05B
WFG:
-$751.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WY vs. WFG — Risk / Return Rank
WY
WFG
WY vs. WFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WY | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.00 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.19 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | -0.32 | +0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WY vs. WFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WY drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, roughly equal to the maximum WFG drawdown of -78.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WY and WFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WY | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -78.66% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.78% | -24.18% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.98% | -41.68% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.02% | -41.68% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -78.66% | +16.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.40% | -33.70% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -22.09% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.95% | 14.18% | -4.23% |
Volatility
WY vs. WFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is 10.97%, while West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that WY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WY | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 13.15% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.45% | 25.17% | -5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.08% | 32.95% | -5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 34.10% | -7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.22% | 39.78% | -7.56% |
Dividends
WY vs. WFG - Dividend Comparison
WY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than WFG's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | 1.97% | 2.09% | 1.61% | 1.40% | 2.03% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.37% | 1.15% | 0.41% | 0.79% | 0.74% |
WY Weyerhaeuser Company | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.34% | 4.77% | 7.00% | 2.87% | 1.52% | 4.50% | 6.04% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 4.00% |
Financials
WY vs. WFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Weyerhaeuser Company and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WY vs. WFG - Profitability Comparison
WY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported a gross profit of 311.00M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.
WFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 32.16M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.3%.
WY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported an operating income of 223.00M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
WFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported an operating income of -76.99M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.5%.
WY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported a net income of 162.00M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
WFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a net income of -59.45M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WY and WFG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WFG has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to WY (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WY dropped -75.69% vs WFG's -78.66%.
WY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WY and WFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer