WY vs. WFG
WY (Weyerhaeuser Company) and WFG (West Fraser Timber Co Ltd) are both stocks. WY operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate), while WFG operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, WY returned 1.45%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for WFG. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WY vs. WFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WY achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than WFG's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, WY has underperformed WFG with an annualized return of 1.45%, while WFG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.
WY
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- -2.46%
- 3Y*
- -2.78%
- 5Y*
- -3.86%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
WFG
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 7.66%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- -7.18%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
WY vs. WFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WY Weyerhaeuser Company | 3.85% | -13.05% | -16.61% | 18.04% | -20.44% | 26.92% | 13.04% | 45.57% | -35.46% | 21.60% |
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | 10.47% | -28.08% | 2.80% | 20.26% | -22.82% | 49.57% | 47.93% | -8.82% | -19.45% | 73.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between WY and WFG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, WY and WFG have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
WY:
$0.73
WFG:
-$19.47
WY:
1.91
WFG:
0.84
WY:
$6.92B
WFG:
$6.31B
WY:
$928.00M
WFG:
-$205.25M
WY:
$999.00M
WFG:
-$89.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WY vs. WFG — Risk / Return Rank
WY
WFG
WY vs. WFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WY | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | -0.23 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | -0.11 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.99 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | -0.27 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | -0.48 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WY | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | -0.23 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | -0.01 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.21 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.17 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
WY vs. WFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WY drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum WFG drawdown of -83.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WY and WFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WY | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -83.25% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -25.37% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.98% | -41.68% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.02% | -41.68% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -78.66% | +16.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.72% | -31.65% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.91% | -30.92% | +9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.61% | 14.47% | -3.86% |
Volatility
WY vs. WFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is 7.48%, while West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that WY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WY | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 10.60% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.65% | 23.45% | -4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.86% | 31.78% | -5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.23% | 33.97% | -7.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 39.94% | -7.76% |
Dividends
WY vs. WFG - Dividend Comparison
WY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than WFG's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | 1.91% | 2.09% | 1.61% | 1.40% | 2.03% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.37% | 1.15% | 0.41% | 0.79% | 0.74% |
WY Weyerhaeuser Company | 2.58% | 3.55% | 3.34% | 4.77% | 7.00% | 2.87% | 1.52% | 4.50% | 6.04% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 4.00% |
Financials
WY vs. WFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Weyerhaeuser Company and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WY vs. WFG - Profitability Comparison
WY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported a gross profit of 318.00M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.
WFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.38M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.3%.
WY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported an operating income of 247.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
WFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported an operating income of -288.80M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.7%.
WY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported a net income of 156.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
WFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a net income of -258.55M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of -14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WY and WFG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WFG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to WY (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WY dropped -75.69% vs WFG's -83.25%.
WY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WY and WFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer