PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WY vs. WFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WY vs. WFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WY achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than WFG's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, WY has underperformed WFG with an annualized return of 1.45%, while WFG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.


WY

1D
2.87%
1M
1.67%
YTD
3.85%
6M
12.39%
1Y
-2.46%
3Y*
-2.78%
5Y*
-3.86%
10Y*
1.45%

WFG

1D
-0.78%
1M
7.66%
YTD
10.47%
6M
11.32%
1Y
-7.18%
3Y*
-0.08%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
8.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WY vs. WFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company
3.85%-13.05%-16.61%18.04%-20.44%26.92%13.04%45.57%-35.46%21.60%
WFG
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd
10.47%-28.08%2.80%20.26%-22.82%49.57%47.93%-8.82%-19.45%73.52%

Correlation

The correlation between WY and WFG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.32

Over the past year, WY and WFG have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

WY:

$0.73

WFG:

-$19.47

PS Ratio

WY:

1.91

WFG:

0.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

WY:

$6.92B

WFG:

$6.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WY:

$928.00M

WFG:

-$205.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

WY:

$999.00M

WFG:

-$89.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Weyerhaeuser Company

West Fraser Timber Co Ltd

Return for Risk

WY vs. WFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WY
WY Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
WY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

WFG
WFG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
WFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
WFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WY vs. WFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WYWFGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.10

-0.23

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.05

-0.11

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.99

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

-0.27

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.32

-0.48

+0.16

WY vs. WFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WY Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is higher than the WFG Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WY and WFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WYWFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

-0.23

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

-0.01

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.21

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.17

-0.03

Drawdowns

WY vs. WFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WY drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum WFG drawdown of -83.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WY and WFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WYWFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-83.25%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.96%

-25.37%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.98%

-41.68%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.02%

-41.68%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

-78.66%

+16.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.72%

-31.65%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.91%

-30.92%

+9.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.61%

14.47%

-3.86%

Volatility

WY vs. WFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is 7.48%, while West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that WY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WYWFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

10.60%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.65%

23.45%

-4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.86%

31.78%

-5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.23%

33.97%

-7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.18%

39.94%

-7.76%

Dividends

WY vs. WFG - Dividend Comparison

WY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than WFG's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WFG
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd
1.91%2.09%1.61%1.40%2.03%0.59%0.93%1.37%1.15%0.41%0.79%0.74%
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company
2.58%3.55%3.34%4.77%7.00%2.87%1.52%4.50%6.04%3.55%4.12%4.00%

Financials

WY vs. WFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Weyerhaeuser Company and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
1.73B
1.83B
(WY) Total Revenue
(WFG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WY vs. WFG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Weyerhaeuser Company and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
18.4%
1.3%
Portfolio components
WY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported a gross profit of 318.00M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

WFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.38M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.3%.

WY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported an operating income of 247.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

WFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported an operating income of -288.80M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.7%.

WY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported a net income of 156.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

WFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a net income of -258.55M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of -14.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WY and WFG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to WY (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WY dropped -75.69% vs WFG's -83.25%.

WY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WY and WFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer