WFG vs. BCC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC).

Performance

WFG vs. BCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WFG vs. BCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd	7.56%	-28.08%	2.80%	20.26%	-22.82%	49.57%	47.93%	-8.82%	-19.45%	73.52%
BCC Boise Cascade Company	2.28%	-37.47%	-4.02%	106.65%	1.53%	62.14%	37.01%	59.08%	-38.36%	77.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WFG : $5.12B BCC : $2.78B
EPS WFG : -$15.63 BCC : $3.85
PS Ratio WFG : 0.87 BCC : 0.44
PB Ratio WFG : 0.64 BCC : 1.34
Total Revenue (TTM) WFG : $5.93B BCC : $6.40B
Gross Profit (TTM) WFG : $249.37M BCC : $780.08M
EBITDA (TTM) WFG : $213.26M BCC : $349.78M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFG achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than BCC's 2.28% return. Over the past 10 years, WFG has underperformed BCC with an annualized return of 6.29%, while BCC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.30% annualized return.

WFG

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 7.56%
• 6M: -2.68%
• 1Y: -14.55%
• 3Y*: -1.13%
• 5Y*: -0.87%
• 10Y*: 6.29%

BCC

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: -2.43%
• 1Y: -23.29%
• 3Y*: 11.19%
• 5Y*: 10.21%
• 10Y*: 18.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WFG vs. BCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFG

WFG Risk / Return Rank: 21
WFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
WFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
WFG Omega Ratio Rank: 20
WFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
WFG Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BCC

BCC Risk / Return Rank: 17
BCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BCC Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BCC Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFG vs. BCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WFG	BCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	-0.60	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.48	-0.76	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.92	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	-0.65	+0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	-1.10	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WFG vs. BCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFG Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is comparable to the BCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFG and BCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WFG	BCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46	-0.60	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.25	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.44	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.29	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between WFG and BCC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WFG vs. BCC - Dividend Comparison

WFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than BCC's 1.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd	1.96%	2.09%	1.61%	1.40%	2.03%	0.59%	0.93%	1.37%	1.15%	0.41%	0.79%	0.74%
BCC Boise Cascade Company	1.16%	1.17%	4.90%	6.73%	5.84%	7.61%	4.18%	3.75%	5.45%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WFG vs. BCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFG drawdown since its inception was -83.25%, which is greater than BCC's maximum drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFG and BCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WFG	BCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.25%	-67.67%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.82%	-34.95%	+9.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.68%	-56.31%	+14.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.66%	-56.31%	-22.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.45%	-50.08%	+16.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.88%	-22.66%	-8.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.32%	20.51%	-7.19%

Volatility

WFG vs. BCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) is 8.76%, while Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that WFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WFG	BCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.76%	9.61%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.72%	25.90%	-3.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.70%	39.17%	-7.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.13%	40.95%	-6.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.31%	41.62%	-1.31%

Financials

WFG vs. BCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between West Fraser Timber Co Ltd and Boise Cascade Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a gross profit of -147.68M and revenue of 1.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -9.1%.

BCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported an operating income of -305.12M and revenue of 1.62B, resulting in an operating margin of -18.8%.

BCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 15.95M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

WFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a net income of -1.05B and revenue of 1.62B, resulting in a net margin of -64.5%.

BCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 19.88M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.