WFG vs. BCC
WFG (West Fraser Timber Co Ltd) and BCC (Boise Cascade Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Lumber & Wood Production industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, WFG returned 8.35%/yr vs 16.64%/yr for BCC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WFG vs. BCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFG achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than BCC's -5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, WFG has underperformed BCC with an annualized return of 8.35%, while BCC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.64% annualized return.
WFG
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 7.66%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- -7.18%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
BCC
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -11.12%
- YTD
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- -17.76%
- 3Y*
- 0.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.64%
WFG vs. BCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | 10.47% | -28.08% | 2.80% | 20.26% | -22.82% | 49.57% | 47.93% | -8.82% | -19.45% | 73.52% |
BCC Boise Cascade Company | -5.40% | -37.47% | -4.02% | 106.65% | 1.53% | 62.14% | 37.01% | 59.08% | -38.36% | 77.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFG and BCC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2013 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, WFG and BCC have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
WFG:
$5.26B
BCC:
$2.49B
WFG:
-$19.47
BCC:
$2.98
WFG:
0.84
BCC:
0.40
WFG:
0.67
BCC:
1.24
WFG:
$6.31B
BCC:
$6.37B
WFG:
-$205.25M
BCC:
$709.89M
WFG:
-$89.14M
BCC:
$308.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFG vs. BCC — Risk / Return Rank
WFG
BCC
WFG vs. BCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFG | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | -0.47 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | -0.52 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.95 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | -0.65 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | -1.15 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFG | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | -0.47 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.18 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.40 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.27 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
WFG vs. BCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFG drawdown since its inception was -83.25%, which is greater than BCC's maximum drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFG and BCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFG | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.25% | -67.67% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.37% | -29.60% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.68% | -56.47% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.68% | -56.47% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.66% | -56.47% | -22.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.65% | -53.83% | +22.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.92% | -23.01% | -7.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.47% | 16.72% | -2.25% |
Volatility
WFG vs. BCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) is 10.60%, while Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a volatility of 11.99%. This indicates that WFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFG | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.60% | 11.99% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.45% | 27.31% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.78% | 37.96% | -6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 40.81% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.94% | 41.70% | -1.76% |
Dividends
WFG vs. BCC - Dividend Comparison
WFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than BCC's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 1.27% | 1.17% | 4.90% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | 1.91% | 2.09% | 1.61% | 1.40% | 2.03% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.37% | 1.15% | 0.41% | 0.79% | 0.74% |
Financials
WFG vs. BCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between West Fraser Timber Co Ltd and Boise Cascade Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WFG vs. BCC - Profitability Comparison
WFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.38M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.3%.
BCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported an operating income of -288.80M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.7%.
BCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 27.79M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
WFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a net income of -258.55M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of -14.1%.
BCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WFG and BCC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCC has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to WFG (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFG dropped -83.25% vs BCC's -67.67%.
WFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFG and BCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer