PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXET vs. IBRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXET vs. IBRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 36.00% return, which is significantly higher than IBRN's 18.23% return.


WXET

1D
-1.68%
1M
13.05%
6M
32.83%
YTD
36.00%
1Y
2.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBRN

1D
-2.16%
1M
9.69%
6M
19.74%
YTD
18.23%
1Y
69.86%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXET vs. IBRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
36.00%-37.99%-0.40%
IBRN
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF
18.23%28.49%-1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between WXET and IBRN is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

-0.08

The correlation between WXET and IBRN shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXET vs. IBRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXET
WXET Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WXET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXET Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
WXET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXET Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IBRN
IBRN Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IBRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBRN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IBRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXET vs. IBRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WXETIBRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.43

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

7.98

-7.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

22.47

-22.35

WXET vs. IBRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXET Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the IBRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXET and IBRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WXET vs. IBRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than IBRN's maximum drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and IBRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXETIBRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-35.38%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.76%

-8.80%

-21.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.70%

-5.16%

-24.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-9.63%

-21.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.75%

3.12%

+13.63%

Volatility

WXET vs. IBRN - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) at 6.66%. This indicates that WXET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXETIBRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.22%

6.66%

+8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.40%

19.29%

+22.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.94%

25.51%

+23.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.47%

25.34%

+23.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.47%

25.34%

+23.13%

WXET vs. IBRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBRN's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXET vs. IBRN - Dividend Comparison

WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than IBRN's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBRN
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF
0.84%0.99%0.40%0.06%
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
1.77%3.57%0.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WXET and IBRN have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WXET has higher volatility (15.22%) compared to IBRN (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs IBRN's -35.38%.

On 1-year performance, IBRN leads with 69.86% vs 2.11% for WXET. On fees, IBRN is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBRN has performed better with a 69.86% return vs 2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBRN is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.

WXET has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.84% for IBRN.

WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while IBRN is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.47% for IBRN.

IBRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXET and IBRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer