WXET vs. GLDW
WXET (Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF) and GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WXET is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. WXET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDW.
Performance
WXET vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than GLDW's 1.00% return.
WXET
- 1D
- -5.28%
- 1M
- -17.12%
- YTD
- 21.04%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- -11.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WXET vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | 21.04% | -12.06% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 1.00% | 7.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between WXET and GLDW is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WXET vs. GLDW — Risk / Return Rank
WXET
GLDW
WXET vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WXET | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.01 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WXET | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.42 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
WXET vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and GLDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WXET | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.31% | -23.59% | -24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.43% | -22.51% | -14.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.50% | -8.93% | -21.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.40% | — | — |
Volatility
WXET vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WXET | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.13% | 36.90% | +13.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.57% | 36.90% | +11.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.57% | 36.90% | +11.67% |
WXET vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WXET vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison
WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than GLDW's 19.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 19.48% | 3.75% | 0.00% |
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | 2.08% | 3.57% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WXET and GLDW have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WXET is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WXET is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 2.08% for WXET.
WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.99% for GLDW.
Find the right allocation for WXET and GLDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer