WXET vs. FLUD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

WXET (Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF) and FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WXET is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while FLUD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WXET returned 16.30% vs 4.28% for FLUD. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. WXET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLUD.

Performance

WXET vs. FLUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 53.02% return, which is significantly higher than FLUD's 1.95% return.

WXET

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 23.90%
• 6M: 50.80%
• YTD: 53.02%
• 1Y: 16.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLUD

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 1.74%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXET vs. FLUD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF	53.02%	-37.99%	-0.40%
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.95%	5.36%	0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WXET and FLUD is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	-0.13

Return for Risk

WXET vs. FLUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXET

WXET Risk / Return Rank: 17
WXET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
WXET Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
WXET Omega Ratio Rank: 18
WXET Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
WXET Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FLUD

FLUD Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FLUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLUD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FLUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLUD Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXET vs. FLUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WXET	FLUD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	2.75	-2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	4.35	-3.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.60	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	9.82	-9.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.97	40.09	-39.12

WXET vs. FLUD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXET Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the FLUD Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXET and FLUD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WXET vs. FLUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than FLUD's maximum drawdown of -1.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and FLUD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WXET	FLUD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.31%	-1.66%	-46.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.76%	-0.44%	-30.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.59%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.90%	0.00%	-20.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-0.24%	-30.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.78%	0.11%	+16.67%

Volatility

WXET vs. FLUD - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) has a higher volatility of 18.12% compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) at 0.23%. This indicates that WXET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WXET	FLUD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.12%	0.23%	+17.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.61%	0.78%	+41.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.06%	1.57%	+48.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.10%	1.34%	+47.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.10%	1.26%	+47.84%

WXET vs. FLUD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FLUD's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

WXET vs. FLUD - Dividend Comparison

WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than FLUD's 4.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.15%	4.51%	4.97%	4.72%	1.39%	0.92%	0.93%
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF	1.58%	3.57%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WXET and FLUD in my portfolio?

WXET and FLUD have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WXET or FLUD?

WXET has higher volatility (18.12%) compared to FLUD (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs FLUD's -1.66%.

Which ETF is better, WXET or FLUD?

On 1-year performance, WXET leads with 16.30% vs 4.28% for FLUD. On fees, FLUD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLUD has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WXET or FLUD?

Over the 1-year period, WXET has performed better with a 16.30% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WXET or FLUD?

FLUD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WXET or FLUD?

FLUD has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 1.58% for WXET.

What is the main difference between WXET and FLUD?

WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while FLUD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.15% for FLUD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.