PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXET vs. FLJJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXET vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than FLJJ's 4.98% return.


WXET

1D
-5.28%
1M
-17.12%
YTD
21.04%
6M
7.24%
1Y
-11.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLJJ

1D
-0.00%
1M
1.88%
YTD
4.98%
6M
5.80%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXET vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
21.04%-37.99%-0.40%
FLJJ
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF
4.98%11.35%-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WXET and FLJJ is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

-0.09

The correlation between WXET and FLJJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXET vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXET
WXET Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WXET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXET Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXET Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WXET Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXET Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJJ
FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXET vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WXETFLJJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

3.02

-3.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.01

4.67

-4.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.65

-0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

3.98

-4.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

20.87

-21.35

WXET vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXET Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXET and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WXETFLJJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

3.02

-3.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

2.14

-2.51

Drawdowns

WXET vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and FLJJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXETFLJJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-6.91%

-41.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.64%

-3.86%

-31.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.43%

-0.05%

-37.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.50%

-0.78%

-29.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.40%

0.73%

+22.67%

Volatility

WXET vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) has a higher volatility of 22.01% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) at 0.86%. This indicates that WXET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXETFLJJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.01%

0.86%

+21.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.70%

3.59%

+36.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.13%

5.10%

+45.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.57%

6.21%

+42.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.57%

6.21%

+42.36%

WXET vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJJ's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXET vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while FLJJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FLJJ
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
2.08%3.57%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


WXET and FLJJ have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WXET has higher volatility (22.01%) compared to FLJJ (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 15.29% vs -11.24% for WXET. On fees, FLJJ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FLJJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 15.29% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJJ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.

WXET has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for FLJJ.

WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while FLJJ is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.74% for FLJJ.

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXET and FLJJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer