WXET vs. DZZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WXET (Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF) and DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. WXET is actively managed, while DZZ is passively managed. Over the past year, WXET returned -7.52% vs 11.20% for DZZ. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WXET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DZZ.

Performance

WXET vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -48.31% return.

WXET

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: -11.55%
• YTD: 27.79%
• 6M: 12.24%
• 1Y: -7.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DZZ

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -16.65%
• YTD: -48.31%
• 6M: -41.62%
• 1Y: 11.20%
• 3Y*: -6.90%
• 5Y*: -4.82%
• 10Y*: -10.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXET vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF	27.79%	-37.99%	-0.40%
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes	-48.31%	132.78%	-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between WXET and DZZ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024	0.08

Return for Risk

WXET vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXET

WXET Risk / Return Rank: 8
WXET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WXET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
WXET Omega Ratio Rank: 8
WXET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
WXET Martin Ratio Rank: 8

DZZ

DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 19
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXET vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WXET	DZZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	0.07	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	1.69	-1.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.22	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	0.14	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	0.21	-0.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WXET vs. DZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXET Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the DZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXET and DZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WXET	DZZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	0.07	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	-0.23	-0.08

Drawdowns

WXET vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, smaller than the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and DZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WXET	DZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.31%	-96.64%	+48.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-80.84%	+45.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-80.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-80.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.94%	-95.16%	+61.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	-82.30%	+51.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.34%	53.19%	-29.85%

Volatility

WXET vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) is 21.55%, while DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a volatility of 30.21%. This indicates that WXET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WXET	DZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.55%	30.21%	-8.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.33%	59.65%	-20.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.90%	169.45%	-119.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.44%	83.63%	-35.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.44%	64.05%	-15.61%

WXET vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WXET vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison

WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF	1.97%	3.57%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WXET and DZZ in my portfolio?

WXET and DZZ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WXET or DZZ?

DZZ has higher volatility (30.21%) compared to WXET (21.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs DZZ's -96.64%.

Which ETF is better, WXET or DZZ?

On 1-year performance, DZZ leads with 11.20% vs -7.52% for WXET. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, WXET has been the lower-risk option at 21.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WXET or DZZ?

Over the 1-year period, DZZ has performed better with a 11.20% return vs -7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WXET or DZZ?

DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WXET or DZZ?

WXET has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for DZZ.

What is the main difference between WXET and DZZ?

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.75% for DZZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.