WWWFX vs. STPAX
WWWFX (Kinetics Internet No Load) and STPAX (Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WWWFX returned 14.75%/yr vs 16.76%/yr for STPAX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WWWFX charges 1.71%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for STPAX.
Performance
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWWFX achieves a -10.81% return, which is significantly lower than STPAX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WWWFX has underperformed STPAX with an annualized return of 14.75%, while STPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.76% annualized return.
WWWFX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- YTD
- -10.81%
- 6M
- -11.96%
- 1Y
- -21.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
STPAX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load | -10.81% | -9.04% | 76.42% | 29.74% | -24.28% | 15.35% | 56.42% | 26.44% | -26.97% | 56.61% |
STPAX Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio | 7.13% | 16.20% | 20.02% | 45.01% | -31.89% | 16.54% | 26.75% | 45.00% | 0.06% | 27.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between WWWFX and STPAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WWWFX and STPAX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WWWFX vs. STPAX — Risk / Return Rank
WWWFX
STPAX
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio (STPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WWWFX | STPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.23 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 1.45 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 4.76 | -6.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWWFX drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum STPAX drawdown of -94.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWWFX and STPAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWWFX | STPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -94.25% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.95% | -15.49% | -16.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.95% | -22.78% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.65% | -37.07% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | -37.07% | -5.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.82% | -5.07% | -25.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -58.65% | +27.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.31% | 4.72% | +12.59% |
Volatility
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Volatility Comparison
Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio (STPAX) at 7.00%. This indicates that WWWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WWWFX | STPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 7.00% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.62% | 13.95% | +8.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.29% | 17.47% | +11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.94% | 21.84% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 22.11% | +4.73% |
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WWWFX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is lower than STPAX's 2.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Dividend Comparison
WWWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than STPAX's 16.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPAX Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio | 16.15% | 17.30% | 13.90% | 7.63% | 22.55% | 13.94% | 14.21% | 12.52% | 4.84% | 8.32% | 9.28% | 12.58% |
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load | 2.02% | 1.81% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 39.59% | 18.48% | 8.72% | 27.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WWWFX and STPAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWWFX has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to STPAX (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWWFX dropped -75.71% vs STPAX's -94.25%.
STPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WWWFX and STPAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer