WWWFX vs. STPAX
WWWFX (Kinetics Internet No Load) and STPAX (Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WWWFX returned 14.80%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for STPAX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WWWFX charges 1.71%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for STPAX.
Performance
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWWFX achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly lower than STPAX's 8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WWWFX has underperformed STPAX with an annualized return of 14.80%, while STPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.24% annualized return.
WWWFX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- -12.39%
- YTD
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -25.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
STPAX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 16.24%
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load | -7.90% | -9.04% | 76.42% | 29.74% | -24.28% | 15.35% | 56.42% | 26.44% | -26.97% | 56.61% |
STPAX Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio | 8.34% | 16.20% | 20.02% | 45.01% | -31.89% | 16.54% | 26.75% | 45.00% | 0.06% | 27.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between WWWFX and STPAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WWWFX and STPAX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WWWFX vs. STPAX — Risk / Return Rank
WWWFX
STPAX
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio (STPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WWWFX | STPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.17 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.05 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 3.32 | -4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWWFX drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum STPAX drawdown of -94.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWWFX and STPAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWWFX | STPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -94.25% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.51% | -15.49% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.51% | -22.78% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.65% | -37.07% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | -37.07% | -5.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.57% | -4.00% | -24.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -58.56% | +27.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.61% | 4.91% | +13.70% |
Volatility
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) is 5.67%, while Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio (STPAX) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that WWWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WWWFX | STPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 6.62% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.35% | 14.52% | +7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.24% | 17.86% | +11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 21.92% | +6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 22.09% | +4.75% |
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WWWFX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is lower than STPAX's 2.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
WWWFX vs. STPAX - Dividend Comparison
WWWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than STPAX's 15.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPAX Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio | 15.97% | 17.30% | 13.90% | 7.63% | 22.55% | 13.94% | 14.21% | 12.52% | 4.84% | 8.32% | 9.28% | 12.58% |
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load | 1.96% | 1.81% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 39.59% | 18.48% | 8.72% | 27.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WWWFX and STPAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STPAX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to WWWFX (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWWFX dropped -75.71% vs STPAX's -94.25%.
STPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WWWFX and STPAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer