WWWFX vs. AIO
WWWFX (Kinetics Internet No Load) and AIO (Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - WWWFX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kinetics, while AIO is a Artificial Intelligence fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 5 years, WWWFX returned 7.05%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for AIO. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WWWFX charges 1.71%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for AIO.
Performance
WWWFX vs. AIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWWFX achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than AIO's 22.73% return.
WWWFX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -5.92%
- YTD
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- -22.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.01%
AIO
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 22.73%
- 1Y
- 18.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.96M | $1.85M | $2.16M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WWWFX vs. AIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load | -8.22% | -9.04% | 76.42% | 29.74% | -24.28% | 15.35% | 56.42% | -0.50% |
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund | 22.73% | 0.48% | 54.48% | 19.27% | -28.06% | 13.51% | 46.27% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between WWWFX and AIO is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2019 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WWWFX vs. AIO — Risk / Return Rank
WWWFX
AIO
WWWFX vs. AIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WWWFX | AIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.16 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 1.34 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 3.94 | -5.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WWWFX vs. AIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWWFX drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, which is greater than AIO's maximum drawdown of -44.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWWFX and AIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWWFX | AIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -44.88% | -30.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.51% | -13.59% | -18.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.51% | -30.23% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.65% | -37.39% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.81% | -9.54% | -19.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.32% | -10.81% | -20.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.75% | 4.60% | +15.15% |
Volatility
WWWFX vs. AIO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) is 5.10%, while Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that WWWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WWWFX | AIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 6.97% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.27% | 15.74% | +5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.13% | 20.02% | +9.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 22.39% | +5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 26.85% | +0.02% |
WWWFX vs. AIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
WWWFX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than AIO's 1.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
WWWFX vs. AIO - Dividend Comparison
WWWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than AIO's 11.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund | 11.96% | 13.75% | 7.30% | 10.34% | 11.12% | 19.97% | 9.31% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load | 1.97% | 1.81% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 39.59% | 18.48% | 8.72% | 27.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WWWFX and AIO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIO has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to WWWFX (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWWFX dropped -75.71% vs AIO's -44.88%.
AIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WWWFX and AIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer