WWWFX vs. AIO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WWWFX (Kinetics Internet No Load) and AIO (Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, WWWFX returned 8.11%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for AIO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WWWFX charges 1.71%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for AIO.

Performance

WWWFX vs. AIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWWFX achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than AIO's 30.26% return.

WWWFX

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -11.38%
• YTD: -7.07%
• 6M: -12.13%
• 1Y: -21.06%
• 3Y*: 26.31%
• 5Y*: 8.11%
• 10Y*: 14.91%

AIO

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 11.21%
• YTD: 30.26%
• 6M: 29.79%
• 1Y: 29.76%
• 3Y*: 29.61%
• 5Y*: 13.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWWFX vs. AIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load	-7.07%	-9.04%	76.42%	29.74%	-24.28%	15.35%	56.42%	0.49%
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund	30.26%	0.48%	54.48%	19.27%	-28.06%	13.51%	46.27%	1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WWWFX and AIO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019	0.46

The correlation between WWWFX and AIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WWWFX vs. AIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWWFX

WWWFX Risk / Return Rank: 1
WWWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
WWWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
WWWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
WWWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
WWWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

AIO

AIO Risk / Return Rank: 36
AIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
AIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AIO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
AIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AIO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWWFX vs. AIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WWWFX	AIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	1.68	-2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	2.41	-3.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.29	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	2.62	-3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	7.77	-9.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WWWFX vs. AIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWWFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the AIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWWFX and AIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WWWFX	AIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	1.68	-2.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.60	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.66	-0.13

Drawdowns

WWWFX vs. AIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWWFX drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, which is greater than AIO's maximum drawdown of -44.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWWFX and AIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WWWFX	AIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.71%	-44.88%	-30.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.95%	-11.42%	-20.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.95%	-30.23%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.65%	-37.39%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.93%	0.00%	-27.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-10.96%	-20.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.94%	3.84%	+12.10%

Volatility

WWWFX vs. AIO - Volatility Comparison

Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) at 5.68%. This indicates that WWWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WWWFX	AIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.62%	5.68%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.94%	13.37%	+9.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.95%	17.86%	+11.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.86%	22.04%	+5.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.76%	26.87%	-0.11%

WWWFX vs. AIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWWFX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than AIO's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

WWWFX vs. AIO - Dividend Comparison

WWWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than AIO's 10.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund	10.90%	13.75%	7.30%	10.34%	11.12%	19.97%	9.31%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load	1.94%	1.81%	0.94%	0.75%	0.84%	0.85%	0.00%	1.45%	39.59%	18.48%	8.72%	27.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WWWFX and AIO in my portfolio?

WWWFX and AIO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WWWFX or AIO?

WWWFX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to AIO (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWWFX dropped -75.71% vs AIO's -44.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.