WWNPX vs. WWWFX
WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) and WWWFX (Kinetics Internet No Load) are both mutual funds - WWNPX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Kinetics, while WWWFX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kinetics. Over the past 10 years, WWNPX returned 17.86%/yr vs 14.75%/yr for WWWFX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WWNPX charges 1.64%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for WWWFX.
Performance
WWNPX vs. WWWFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWNPX achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly higher than WWWFX's -10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, WWNPX has outperformed WWWFX with an annualized return of 17.86%, while WWWFX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.75% annualized return.
WWNPX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -11.42%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- -3.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- 17.86%
WWWFX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- YTD
- -10.81%
- 6M
- -11.96%
- 1Y
- -21.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
WWNPX vs. WWWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 12.75% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 28.41% |
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load | -10.81% | -9.04% | 76.42% | 29.74% | -24.28% | 15.35% | 56.42% | 26.44% | -26.97% | 56.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between WWNPX and WWWFX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1999 | 0.72 |
The correlation between WWNPX and WWWFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WWNPX vs. WWWFX — Risk / Return Rank
WWNPX
WWWFX
WWNPX vs. WWWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) and Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WWNPX | WWWFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | -0.70 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | -1.29 | +0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WWNPX vs. WWWFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWNPX drawdown since its inception was -67.87%, smaller than the maximum WWWFX drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWNPX and WWWFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWNPX | WWWFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.87% | -75.71% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.71% | -31.95% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.13% | -31.95% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.13% | -40.65% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.51% | -42.32% | -1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.66% | -30.82% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.93% | -31.33% | +17.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | 17.31% | -5.54% |
Volatility
WWNPX vs. WWWFX - Volatility Comparison
Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) at 7.88%. This indicates that WWNPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WWWFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WWNPX | WWWFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 7.88% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.86% | 22.62% | +4.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.74% | 29.29% | +4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 27.94% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.71% | 26.84% | +1.87% |
WWNPX vs. WWWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WWNPX has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is lower than WWWFX's 1.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
WWNPX vs. WWWFX - Dividend Comparison
WWNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than WWWFX's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 7.28% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load | 2.02% | 1.81% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 39.59% | 18.48% | 8.72% | 27.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WWNPX and WWWFX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWNPX has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to WWWFX (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWNPX dropped -67.87% vs WWWFX's -75.71%.
WWNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WWNPX and WWWFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer