WWNPX vs. CTIGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) and CTIGX (Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, WWNPX returned 14.05%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for CTIGX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WWNPX charges 1.64%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CTIGX.

Performance

WWNPX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWNPX achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly lower than CTIGX's 26.75% return.

WWNPX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -10.79%
• YTD: 18.51%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: -3.20%
• 3Y*: 30.17%
• 5Y*: 14.05%
• 10Y*: 18.16%

CTIGX

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 5.60%
• YTD: 26.75%
• 6M: 26.58%
• 1Y: 55.18%
• 3Y*: 32.42%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWNPX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	18.51%	-14.61%	88.34%	-16.97%	29.18%	38.14%	3.38%	-0.64%
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund	26.75%	21.21%	44.09%	12.26%	-34.88%	7.64%	58.94%	-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WWNPX and CTIGX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.50

The correlation between WWNPX and CTIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WWNPX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWNPX

WWNPX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WWNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WWNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
WWNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
WWNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WWNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CTIGX

CTIGX Risk / Return Rank: 65
CTIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CTIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CTIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
CTIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CTIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWNPX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WWNPX	CTIGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	2.17	-2.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	2.80	-2.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.36	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	4.93	-5.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.18	19.52	-19.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WWNPX vs. CTIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWNPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the CTIGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWNPX and CTIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WWNPX	CTIGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	2.17	-2.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.42	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.53	-0.02

Drawdowns

WWNPX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWNPX drawdown since its inception was -67.87%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWNPX and CTIGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WWNPX	CTIGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.87%	-46.26%	-21.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.22%	-11.56%	-11.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.13%	-29.30%	-11.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.13%	-46.26%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.17%	-1.95%	-26.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-18.62%	+4.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.52%	2.92%	+8.60%

Volatility

WWNPX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) is 7.16%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that WWNPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WWNPX	CTIGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	8.90%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.77%	20.24%	+6.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.74%	26.25%	+6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.84%	26.97%	+5.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.58%	29.11%	-0.53%

WWNPX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWNPX has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

WWNPX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison

WWNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than CTIGX's 3.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund	3.62%	4.59%	2.80%	0.00%	0.00%	11.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	6.93%	8.21%	2.95%	5.65%	2.00%	1.67%	2.15%	1.00%	10.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WWNPX and CTIGX in my portfolio?

WWNPX and CTIGX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WWNPX or CTIGX?

CTIGX has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to WWNPX (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWNPX dropped -67.87% vs CTIGX's -46.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.