PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WVALX vs. WBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WVALX vs. WBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weitz Value Fund (WVALX) and Weitz Balanced Fund (WBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WVALX achieves a -5.45% return, which is significantly lower than WBALX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, WVALX has outperformed WBALX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while WBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.46% annualized return.


WVALX

1D
-1.10%
1M
1.15%
YTD
-5.45%
6M
-4.90%
1Y
-3.04%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
9.08%

WBALX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.49%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
-0.62%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
5.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WVALX vs. WBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WVALX
Weitz Value Fund
-5.45%-0.21%12.76%29.72%-22.89%26.86%18.41%34.16%-4.88%15.60%
WBALX
Weitz Balanced Fund
-0.90%3.77%6.85%9.27%-9.95%13.11%8.13%17.94%-1.79%11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between WVALX and WBALX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2003

0.94

The correlation between WVALX and WBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WVALX vs. WBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WVALX
WVALX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
WVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

WBALX
WBALX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
WBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
WBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WVALX vs. WBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Value Fund (WVALX) and Weitz Balanced Fund (WBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WVALXWBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.07

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

0.39

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

1.20

-1.60

WVALX vs. WBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WVALX Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the WBALX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WVALX and WBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WVALXWBALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

0.40

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.37

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.71

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.56

+0.03

Drawdowns

WVALX vs. WBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WVALX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than WBALX's maximum drawdown of -43.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WVALX and WBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WVALXWBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.96%

-43.04%

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.45%

-6.02%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-6.82%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-14.81%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.57%

-15.93%

-16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.78%

-2.60%

-8.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-4.11%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.32%

1.97%

+4.35%

Volatility

WVALX vs. WBALX - Volatility Comparison

Weitz Value Fund (WVALX) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to Weitz Balanced Fund (WBALX) at 1.56%. This indicates that WVALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WVALXWBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

1.56%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

4.65%

+6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.18%

5.98%

+8.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

7.35%

+10.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

7.70%

+10.54%

WVALX vs. WBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WVALX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than WBALX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

WVALX vs. WBALX - Dividend Comparison

WVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.09%, more than WBALX's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WBALX
Weitz Balanced Fund
4.99%4.95%4.98%1.11%1.95%2.57%1.08%1.88%9.78%2.72%3.26%5.51%
WVALX
Weitz Value Fund
23.09%21.83%11.03%5.38%14.15%3.77%9.12%4.70%10.95%7.16%0.00%12.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, WVALX and WBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WVALX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to WBALX (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WVALX dropped -61.96% vs WBALX's -43.04%.

WBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WVALX and WBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer