PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WULX vs. NBIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WULX vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WULX achieves a 238.07% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 453.13% return.


WULX

1D
-2.27%
1M
29.01%
YTD
238.07%
6M
98.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBIG

1D
-6.73%
1M
83.04%
YTD
453.13%
6M
273.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WULX vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WULX
Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF
238.07%-43.82%
NBIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
453.13%-62.34%

Correlation

The correlation between WULX and NBIG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WULX vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WULX vs. NBIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WULXNBIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Drawdowns

WULX vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WULX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULX and NBIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WULXNBIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.48%

-75.83%

+15.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.75%

-9.57%

+4.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-43.08%

+12.40%

Volatility

WULX vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WULXNBIGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

189.30%

201.21%

-11.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

189.30%

201.21%

-11.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

189.30%

201.21%

-11.91%

WULX vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WULX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WULX vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither WULX nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WULX and NBIG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for WULX.

WULX and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for WULX and 0.75% for NBIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WULX and NBIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer