PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WULX vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WULX vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WULX achieves a 238.07% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 391.03% return.


WULX

1D
-2.27%
1M
29.01%
YTD
238.07%
6M
98.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDG

1D
7.70%
1M
134.89%
YTD
391.03%
6M
367.32%
1Y
1,172.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WULX vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WULX
Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF
238.07%-37.27%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
391.03%-23.24%

Correlation

The correlation between WULX and AMDG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WULX vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WULX

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WULX vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WULX vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WULXAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

3.36

-2.05

Drawdowns

WULX vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WULX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, roughly equal to the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULX and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WULXAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.48%

-63.04%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.75%

0.00%

-4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-25.70%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.80%

Volatility

WULX vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WULXAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

189.30%

129.64%

+59.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

189.30%

130.26%

+59.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

189.30%

130.26%

+59.04%

WULX vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WULX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WULX vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

WULX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.


PositionTTM2025
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
2.28%11.21%
WULX
Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WULX and AMDG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for WULX.

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for WULX.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for WULX and 0.75% for AMDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WULX and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer