PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTV vs. WTBN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTV vs. WTBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund (WTBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than WTBN's 0.02% return.


WTV

1D
0.86%
1M
4.50%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*

WTBN

1D
0.12%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTV vs. WTBN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
11.47%13.51%23.99%1.36%
WTBN
WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund
0.02%6.90%2.26%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and WTBN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023

0.22

The correlation between WTV and WTBN shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTV vs. WTBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

WTBN
WTBN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WTBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTBN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WTBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTBN Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTV vs. WTBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund (WTBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTVWTBNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.18

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

1.35

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

4.22

+7.33

WTV vs. WTBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the WTBN Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and WTBN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTVWTBNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.07

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.83

-0.15

Drawdowns

WTV vs. WTBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than WTBN's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and WTBN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTVWTBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.18%

-4.08%

-38.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-2.86%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.47%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-1.14%

-3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

0.92%

+1.27%

Volatility

WTV vs. WTBN - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund (WTBN) at 1.32%. This indicates that WTV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTVWTBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

1.32%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

2.63%

+5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

3.66%

+8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

4.53%

+12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

4.53%

+15.67%

WTV vs. WTBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WTBN's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTV vs. WTBN - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than WTBN's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTBN
WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund
3.97%4.13%3.47%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
1.64%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTV and WTBN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTV has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to WTBN (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs WTBN's -4.08%.

On 1-year performance, WTV leads with 25.21% vs 3.86% for WTBN. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTBN has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTV has performed better with a 25.21% return vs 3.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for WTBN.

WTBN has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 1.64% for WTV.

WTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while WTBN is Intermediate Core Bond. WTV tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index, while WTBN tracks Bianco Research Fixed Income Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.59% for WTBN.

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTV and WTBN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer