WTV vs. WTAI

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) and WTAI (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WTV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while WTAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence & Innovation Index. WTV is actively managed, while WTAI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTV returned 19.67%/yr vs 25.78%/yr for WTAI. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WTAI.

Performance

WTV vs. WTAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than WTAI's 35.59% return.

WTV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.78%
• 6M: 10.35%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 1Y: 22.76%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 14.25%
• 10Y*: —

WTAI

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -12.28%
• 6M: 31.18%
• YTD: 35.59%
• 1Y: 60.94%
• 3Y*: 25.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTV vs. WTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	13.75%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-8.06%	2.02%
WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund	35.59%	34.83%	6.53%	46.32%	-42.27%	-1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and WTAI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between WTV and WTAI has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WTV vs. WTAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTV	WTAI
Financial Services	18.5%	3.8%
Technology	18.3%	71.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	8.3%
Industrials	10.3%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	9.9%	0.4%
Healthcare	7.5%	-
Communication Services	6.5%	7.2%
Energy	6.4%	-
Real Estate	5.4%	-
Utilities	4.5%	0.9%
Basic Materials	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

WTV vs. WTAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 76
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

WTAI

WTAI Risk / Return Rank: 67
WTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
WTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
WTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
WTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTV vs. WTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTV	WTAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.72	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.16	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.29	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.35	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.37	10.51	-0.14

WTV vs. WTAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the WTAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and WTAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTV vs. WTAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, smaller than the maximum WTAI drawdown of -45.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and WTAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTV	WTAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.18%	-45.96%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.15%	-18.28%	+11.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-31.83%	+13.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-18.28%	+17.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-19.54%	+14.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	5.81%	-3.61%

Volatility

WTV vs. WTAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) is 2.97%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI) has a volatility of 17.84%. This indicates that WTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTV	WTAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	17.84%	-14.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.07%	31.29%	-23.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	35.58%	-23.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	32.28%	-15.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.10%	32.28%	-12.18%

WTV vs. WTAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WTAI's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTV vs. WTAI - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than WTAI's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund	1.33%	1.81%	0.19%	0.24%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.87%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTV and WTAI in my portfolio?

WTV and WTAI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTV or WTAI?

WTAI has higher volatility (17.84%) compared to WTV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs WTAI's -45.96%.

Which ETF is better, WTV or WTAI?

On 3-year performance, WTAI leads with 25.78% vs 19.67% for WTV. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTV or WTAI?

Over the 3-year period, WTAI has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 19.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTV or WTAI?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WTAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTV or WTAI?

WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.33% for WTAI.

What is the main difference between WTV and WTAI?

WTV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while WTAI is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.45% for WTAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.