PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTV vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTV vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 9.50% return.


WTV

1D
0.86%
1M
4.50%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*

NTSX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.30%
YTD
9.50%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTV vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
11.47%13.51%23.99%22.35%-8.06%30.59%6.15%29.69%-10.99%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
9.50%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and NTSX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.74

The correlation between WTV and NTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WTV vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTV
NTSX

Financial Services

19.5%
12.3%

Technology

15.3%
35.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
5.5%

Industrials

10.5%
7.7%

Healthcare

7.3%
8.4%

Communication Services

6.9%
12.5%

Energy

6.8%
3.5%

Real Estate

5.3%
1.5%

Utilities

4.8%
2.1%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.4%

Financial Services

WTV
19.5%
NTSX
12.3%

Technology

WTV
15.3%
NTSX
35.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WTV
10.7%
NTSX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

WTV
10.7%
NTSX
5.5%

Industrials

WTV
10.5%
NTSX
7.7%

Healthcare

WTV
7.3%
NTSX
8.4%

Communication Services

WTV
6.9%
NTSX
12.5%

Energy

WTV
6.8%
NTSX
3.5%

Real Estate

WTV
5.3%
NTSX
1.5%

Utilities

WTV
4.8%
NTSX
2.1%

Basic Materials

WTV
2.2%
NTSX
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTV vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTV vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTVNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.81

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

12.44

-0.89

WTV vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTVNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.09

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.58

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.72

-0.04

Drawdowns

WTV vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTVNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.18%

-31.34%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-9.16%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-16.82%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-31.34%

+12.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.25%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-6.79%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.07%

+0.12%

Volatility

WTV vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) is 3.01%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that WTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTVNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

3.38%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

9.61%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

12.32%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

17.04%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

18.27%

+1.93%

WTV vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WTV vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than NTSX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.07%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
1.64%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTV and NTSX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to WTV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.36% vs 9.87% for NTSX. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.

WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.07% for NTSX.

WTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.20% for NTSX.

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTV and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer