PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTRE vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTRE vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF (WTRE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTRE achieves a 23.34% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.


WTRE

1D
-1.36%
1M
6.43%
YTD
23.34%
6M
23.21%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
3.90%

GDMN

1D
-3.68%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
2.73%
1Y
76.93%
3Y*
60.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTRE vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WTRE
WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF
23.34%26.36%-3.27%14.07%-31.68%1.58%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-4.13%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WTRE and GDMN is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.33

WTRE vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTRE
GDMN

Real Estate

64.0%

-

Communication Services

14.3%

-

Technology

11.8%

-

Financial Services

5.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

WTRE
64.0%
GDMN

-

Communication Services

WTRE
14.3%
GDMN

-

Technology

WTRE
11.8%
GDMN

-

Financial Services

WTRE
5.8%
GDMN

-

Basic Materials

WTRE

-

GDMN
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WTRE

-

GDMN

-

Consumer Defensive

WTRE

-

GDMN

-

Energy

WTRE

-

GDMN

-

Healthcare

WTRE

-

GDMN

-

Industrials

WTRE

-

GDMN

-

Utilities

WTRE

-

GDMN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTRE vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTRE
WTRE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
WTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTRE vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF (WTRE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTREGDMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.98

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

4.68

+4.50

WTRE vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTRE and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTREGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.26

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.80

-0.74

Drawdowns

WTRE vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTRE drawdown since its inception was -74.18%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTRE and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTREGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.18%

-52.82%

-21.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-39.03%

+24.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-39.03%

+16.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-37.06%

+34.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.98%

-18.89%

-6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

16.51%

-11.39%

Volatility

WTRE vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF (WTRE) is 6.54%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that WTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTREGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

17.94%

-11.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

51.79%

-35.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

61.32%

-40.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

47.59%

-28.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.49%

47.59%

-29.10%

WTRE vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTRE has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTRE vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

WTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than GDMN's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.82%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTRE
WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF
1.97%2.33%2.69%2.05%1.68%6.47%2.96%7.88%4.49%6.34%5.96%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTRE and GDMN have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to WTRE (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTRE dropped -74.18% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 60.95% vs 18.73% for WTRE. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, WTRE has been the lower-risk option at 6.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 60.95% return vs 18.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for WTRE.

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.97% for WTRE.

WTRE is categorized as REIT, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for WTRE and 0.45% for GDMN.

WTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTRE and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer