WTMY vs. IVES
WTMY (WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF) and IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMY is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while IVES is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. WTMY is actively managed, while IVES is passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTMY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVES.
Performance
WTMY vs. IVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMY achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 27.14% return.
WTMY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVES
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- 18.28%
- YTD
- 27.14%
- 6M
- 24.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTMY vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTMY WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF | 1.07% | 4.72% |
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 27.14% | 25.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMY and IVES is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMY vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank
WTMY
IVES
WTMY vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTMY | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTMY | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 2.32 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
WTMY vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMY drawdown since its inception was -3.67%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMY and IVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMY | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -22.64% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -3.69% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -5.63% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility
WTMY vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMY | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54% | 25.77% | -23.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.57% | 25.77% | -22.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.57% | 25.77% | -22.20% |
WTMY vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMY vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison
WTMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than IVES's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 0.33% | 0.41% |
WTMY WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF | 3.43% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMY and IVES have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTMY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTMY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.
WTMY has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 0.33% for IVES.
WTMY is categorized as High Yield Muni, while IVES is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WTMY and 0.75% for IVES.
Find the right allocation for WTMY and IVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer