WTMY vs. FAAR
WTMY (WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMY is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WTMY returned 5.71% vs 40.73% for FAAR. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. WTMY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
WTMY vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMY achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 25.73% return.
WTMY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 40.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
WTMY vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTMY WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF | 0.97% | 3.68% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 25.73% | 7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMY and FAAR is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMY vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
WTMY
FAAR
WTMY vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTMY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 3.04 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.37 | 4.23 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.52 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 8.44 | -6.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 23.64 | -17.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTMY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 3.04 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.45 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
WTMY vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMY drawdown since its inception was -3.67%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMY and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -18.03% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -4.85% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.11% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -7.85% | +7.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 1.73% | -0.83% |
Volatility
WTMY vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY) is 0.92%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that WTMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 2.44% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.85% | 9.72% | -7.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54% | 13.48% | -10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 13.02% | -9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 11.51% | -7.93% |
WTMY vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMY vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
WTMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than FAAR's 9.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.15% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
WTMY WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF | 3.43% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMY and FAAR have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to WTMY (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMY dropped -3.67% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 1-year performance, FAAR leads with 40.73% vs 5.71% for WTMY. On fees, WTMY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, WTMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 40.73% return vs 5.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTMY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 3.43% for WTMY.
WTMY is categorized as High Yield Muni, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WTMY and 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMY and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer