PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMY vs. CONL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMY vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMY achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -62.12% return.


WTMY

1D
0.10%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.31%
1Y
6.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CONL

1D
-12.32%
1M
-38.47%
YTD
-62.12%
6M
-75.31%
1Y
-79.34%
3Y*
-14.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMY vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WTMY and CONL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMY vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMY
WTMY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WTMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CONL
CONL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMY vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTMYCONLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

0.93

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

-0.86

+3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

-1.21

+8.03

WTMY vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMY and CONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTMYCONLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

-0.57

+3.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

-0.20

+1.35

Drawdowns

WTMY vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMY drawdown since its inception was -3.67%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -93.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMY and CONL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMYCONLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-93.95%

+90.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-92.02%

+89.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-93.48%

+92.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-55.95%

+55.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

65.74%

-64.84%

Volatility

WTMY vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY) is 0.93%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 38.02%. This indicates that WTMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMYCONLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

38.02%

-37.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.85%

101.03%

-99.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54%

139.40%

-136.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.57%

149.93%

-146.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.57%

149.93%

-146.36%

WTMY vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTMY vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

WTMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.31%
WTMY
WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF
3.43%2.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMY and CONL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CONL has higher volatility (38.02%) compared to WTMY (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMY dropped -3.67% vs CONL's -93.95%.

On 1-year performance, WTMY leads with 6.14% vs -79.34% for CONL. On fees, WTMY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, WTMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTMY has performed better with a 6.14% return vs -79.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTMY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

WTMY has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.

WTMY is categorized as High Yield Muni, while CONL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WTMY and 1.15% for CONL.

WTMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMY and CONL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer