PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMU vs. WTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMU vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMU achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than WTV's 13.22% return.


WTMU

1D
0.08%
1M
0.31%
6M
-0.02%
YTD
0.54%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WTV

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.41%
6M
10.48%
YTD
13.22%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMU vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WTMU
WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF
0.54%4.99%
WTV
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund
13.22%13.43%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMU and WTV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMU vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMU
WTMU Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WTMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMU vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTMUWTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.33

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.04

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

9.85

-5.26

WTMU vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMU and WTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTMU vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMU drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMU and WTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMUWTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-42.18%

+37.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-7.15%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-0.24%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-5.00%

+4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.20%

-1.14%

Volatility

WTMU vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) is 0.65%, while WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that WTMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMUWTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

2.81%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

8.01%

-6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

11.83%

-9.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.59%

17.04%

-12.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

20.11%

-15.52%

WTMU vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WTMU vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

WTMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than WTV's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTMU
WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF
3.07%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTV
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund
1.88%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMU and WTV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTV has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to WTMU (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMU dropped -4.24% vs WTV's -42.18%.

On 1-year performance, WTV leads with 21.60% vs 4.87% for WTMU. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTV has performed better with a 21.60% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WTMU.

WTMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 1.88% for WTV.

WTMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while WTV is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WTMU and 0.12% for WTV.

WTMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMU and WTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer