PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMU vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMU vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMU achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 17.07% return.


WTMU

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.07%
6M
-1.35%
YTD
-0.52%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.32%

DHS

1D
0.35%
1M
1.94%
6M
9.42%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.47M$3.71M$2.99M
$17.49K$9.91K$38.76K

WTMU vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WTMU and DHS is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMU vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTMU
WTMU Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WTMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTMU vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTMUDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

4.09

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.72

15.00

-12.28

WTMU vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMU and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTMU vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMU drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMU and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMUDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-67.25%

+63.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-6.30%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-1.89%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-9.48%

+8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.71%

-0.52%

Volatility

WTMU vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) is 1.12%, while WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that WTMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMUDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

3.77%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

7.84%

-5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41%

10.40%

-7.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.58%

13.91%

-9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

16.10%

-11.52%

WTMU vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTMU vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

WTMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than DHS's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.18%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
WTMU
WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF
3.23%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMU and DHS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHS has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to WTMU (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMU dropped -4.24% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 1-year performance, DHS leads with 25.65% vs 3.23% for WTMU. On fees, WTMU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, WTMU has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DHS has performed better with a 25.65% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTMU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.

WTMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 3.18% for DHS.

WTMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WTMU and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMU and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer