WTMF vs. WTV
WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and WTV (WisdomTree US Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while WTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WTMF returned 6.17%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for WTV. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.
Performance
WTMF vs. WTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than WTV's 10.52% return.
WTMF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
WTV
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- —
WTMF vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 8.50% | 12.17% | 3.20% | 16.72% | -6.52% | 9.48% | 0.48% | -2.75% | 0.24% | 1.14% |
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 10.52% | 13.51% | 23.99% | 22.35% | -8.06% | 30.59% | 6.15% | 29.69% | -8.29% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMF and WTV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, WTMF and WTV have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
WTMF vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTMF
WTV
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
WTMF
WTV
Technology
WTMF
WTV
Healthcare
WTMF
WTV
Financial Services
WTMF
WTV
Consumer Cyclical
WTMF
WTV
Real Estate
WTMF
WTV
Energy
WTMF
WTV
Basic Materials
WTMF
WTV
Utilities
WTMF
WTV
Communication Services
WTMF
WTV
Consumer Defensive
WTMF
WTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMF vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank
WTMF
WTV
WTMF vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTMF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.35 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.61 | 3.28 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.08 | 10.69 | +14.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTMF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 1.99 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.77 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.67 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
WTMF vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and WTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -42.18% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.04% | -7.15% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -18.49% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | -19.30% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.96% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -5.06% | -12.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 2.19% | -1.29% |
Volatility
WTMF vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 1.61%, while WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMF | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 3.02% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.84% | 7.90% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.63% | 11.83% | -3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.46% | 17.09% | -7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.07% | 20.20% | -12.13% |
WTMF vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMF vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison
WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than WTV's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.80% | 3.04% | 3.57% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% | 0.00% |
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.59% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMF and WTV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTV has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to WTMF (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs WTV's -42.18%.
On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.17% vs 6.17% for WTMF. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.
WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.65% for WTV.
WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while WTV is Large Cap Value Equities. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while WTV tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.12% for WTV.
WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMF and WTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer