PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMF vs. SOFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMF vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than SOFR's 2.07% return.


WTMF

1D
0.12%
1M
1.08%
6M
6.55%
YTD
8.23%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
3.46%
ALL TIME*
1.16%

SOFR

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
6M
1.79%
YTD
2.07%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$600.52K$493.55K$2.28M
$964.56K$1.15M$1.10M

WTMF vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.23%12.17%1.92%
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
2.07%4.27%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMF and SOFR is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMF vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SOFR
SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTMF vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTMFSOFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

2.97

-1.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

9.36

-4.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.11

37.52

-19.41

WTMF vs. SOFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the SOFR Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMF and SOFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTMF vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and SOFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMFSOFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-0.41%

-30.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-0.41%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.03%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.53%

-0.03%

-17.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.10%

+0.95%

Volatility

WTMF vs. SOFR - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) at 0.27%. This indicates that WTMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMFSOFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

0.27%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

0.64%

+5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

0.89%

+8.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.37%

0.84%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.13%

0.84%

+7.29%

WTMF vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTMF vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison

WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than SOFR's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
3.83%4.22%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.81%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMF and SOFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTMF has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to SOFR (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs SOFR's -0.41%.

On 1-year performance, WTMF leads with 18.92% vs 3.79% for SOFR. On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SOFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTMF has performed better with a 18.92% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.

SOFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.81% for WTMF.

WTMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while SOFR is Multisector Bonds. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while SOFR tracks Secured Overnight Financing Rate. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.20% for SOFR.

SOFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMF and SOFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer