WTMF vs. QCLR
WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTMF returned 9.95%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for QCLR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLR.
Performance
WTMF vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's 0.21% return.
WTMF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
QCLR
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 9.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTMF vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 7.35% | 12.17% | 3.20% | 16.72% | -6.52% | -1.84% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 0.21% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMF and QCLR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | 0.36 |
The correlation between WTMF and QCLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMF vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
WTMF
QCLR
WTMF vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTMF | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.18 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.14 | 0.89 | +4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.97 | 3.21 | +18.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTMF vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and QCLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMF | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -21.77% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.04% | -10.22% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -13.58% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -2.05% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.65% | -6.14% | -11.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 2.84% | -1.90% |
Volatility
WTMF vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 1.58%. This indicates that WTMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMF | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 1.58% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 6.59% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.04% | 9.68% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.53% | 12.38% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.11% | 12.38% | -4.27% |
WTMF vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMF vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than QCLR's 14.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 14.86% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.83% | 3.04% | 3.57% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMF and QCLR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTMF has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to QCLR (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs QCLR's -21.77%.
On 3-year performance, QCLR leads with 13.86% vs 9.95% for WTMF. On fees, QCLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QCLR has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QCLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.86%, compared with 2.83% for WTMF.
WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.60% for QCLR.
WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMF and QCLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer