WTMF vs. FVC
WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and FVC (First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds - WTMF tracks the WisdomTree Managed Futures Index while FVC tracks the Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WTMF returned 3.17%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for FVC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FVC.
Performance
WTMF vs. FVC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than FVC's 14.93% return. Over the past 10 years, WTMF has underperformed FVC with an annualized return of 3.17%, while FVC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.56% annualized return.
WTMF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
FVC
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
WTMF vs. FVC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 7.35% | 12.17% | 3.20% | 16.72% | -6.52% | 9.48% | 0.48% | -2.75% | 0.24% | -3.40% |
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | 14.93% | 2.12% | 12.43% | -4.59% | -6.03% | 21.92% | 12.71% | 19.28% | -8.60% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMF and FVC is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2016 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, WTMF and FVC have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMF vs. FVC — Risk / Return Rank
WTMF
FVC
WTMF vs. FVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTMF | FVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.29 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.14 | 1.58 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.97 | 6.15 | +15.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTMF vs. FVC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, roughly equal to the maximum FVC drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and FVC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMF | FVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -30.96% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.04% | -13.32% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -14.75% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | -22.62% | +9.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.26% | -30.96% | +15.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -2.12% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.65% | -7.03% | -10.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 3.42% | -2.48% |
Volatility
WTMF vs. FVC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 3.11%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMF | FVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 6.85% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 13.70% | -6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.04% | 14.35% | -5.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.53% | 16.49% | -6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.11% | 17.68% | -9.57% |
WTMF vs. FVC - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FVC's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMF vs. FVC - Dividend Comparison
WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than FVC's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | 1.95% | 2.57% | 0.78% | 1.89% | 1.50% | 0.09% | 0.21% | 1.07% | 0.24% | 0.63% | 0.67% |
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.83% | 3.04% | 3.57% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMF and FVC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVC has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to WTMF (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs FVC's -30.96%.
On 10-year performance, FVC leads with 8.56% vs 3.17% for WTMF. On fees, WTMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FVC has performed better with a 8.56% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FVC.
WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.95% for FVC.
WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while FVC tracks Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.71% for FVC.
WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMF and FVC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer